Kojima Report Session 062, MGS4 Demo Not Coming Afterall? >

	2007/10/18 15:49:21: Posted by DM
	According to the latest Kojima Productions Update, the demo at E For All will be the only chance the public has to play MGS4 before it is released. This contradicts the promise of a few updates ago which stated there would be a demo coming on the PSN. Bad form, Kojima Productions! >Link
	Labeled With  metal gear solid 4 konami playstation 3 Comments [6]  | Rate this article: -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  | Avg. rating of 7.0

Smart move in a way ...

Metal Gear Solid 4 won't be available until the Holiday shopping season of 2008.

Kojima can say "Spring of 2008" all he wants, but experts have repeatedly said that Metal Gear Solid 4 has "Holiday shopping season of 2008" as a birthmark.



Also, Metal Gear Solid 4 will NOT be the last game in this series...Kojima said that with MGS3, but that obviously didn't happen...so there is no reason to believe the guy this time.

"Kojima can say "Spring of 2008" all he wants, but experts have repeatedly said that Metal Gear Solid 4 has "Holiday shopping season of 2008" as a birthmark."

Give me proof or just stfu. And as for MGS4 not being the last one, well good for us then. Only you would be pissed if he continued... which is just pathetic.

i would be too itainrite, i dont like gaming soap operas, give us four of five editions tops, then get another IP, i cant stay interested for that long on a title, unless its sports, beat em up, or a racing sim

Response to Itaintrite:

Proof: Sony announced that the Playstation 3 would release worldwide in the spring of 2006. In reality, it was NEVER their plan to release the Playstation 3 worldwide. And Sony knew for a FACT that they would not release the system until late 2006 in American and Japan. Playstation 3 didn't even release in Europe until spring of 2007.

*** When a company associated with Playstation 3 puts a birthday of "Spring" on a product, there is an EXCELLENT chance it will not be released until Christmas.

krogan, how does any of that constitute proof? What you just claimed is SPECULATION.

i understand drawing conclusions based on past precedent, but stop claiming "proof" and "fact", ok?